<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MP3 Sound Quality &amp; Organizing a Digital Music Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jazzodyssey.com/mp3-sound-quality-organizing-a-digital-music-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jazzodyssey.com/mp3-sound-quality-organizing-a-digital-music-library/</link>
	<description>Syd Schwartz&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.jazzodyssey.com/mp3-sound-quality-organizing-a-digital-music-library/comment-page-1/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>john davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatesofdelerium.com/wordpress/?p=192#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>Tiger Direct is selling 300 gig internal drives RIGHT NOW for $89. Outpost.com is selling them for the same price (with rebates involved.) You can easily get 300 GB of storage for $100, and next year at this time it is likely that that number will be 500GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiger Direct is selling 300 gig internal drives RIGHT NOW for $89. Outpost.com is selling them for the same price (with rebates involved.) You can easily get 300 GB of storage for $100, and next year at this time it is likely that that number will be 500GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd Schwartz-Digital Music Den &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Soundbytes 12/9/05</title>
		<link>http://www.jazzodyssey.com/mp3-sound-quality-organizing-a-digital-music-library/comment-page-1/#comment-2134</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd Schwartz-Digital Music Den &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Soundbytes 12/9/05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatesofdelerium.com/wordpress/?p=192#comment-2134</guid>
		<description>[...] Wired continues their series on digital music formats with A Music File by Any Other Name, an article comparing the most common lossy formats, and discussing which ones are the most future proof. As I mentioned in yesterday&#8217;s posting, the only truly future proof way to store digital audio is to use a lossless codec like FLAC, Shorten or Apple Lossless Codec and convert to compressed lossy formats as needed. Hard drive space is getting cheaper and cheaper&#8230;I&#8217;ve gotten no fewer than 3 emails this week alone from places like buy.com offering external 320 gig hard drives for about $170&#8230;.so at about 50 cents per gig and considering you can store about 3 albums per gig in FLAC format it seems pretty economical if you want the maximum quality possible. Wired plans to cover lossless formats in a future article. Wired has gotten a lot of feedback on their music articles published this week and opinions vary widely&#8230;take a look here to see what readers have to say. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wired continues their series on digital music formats with A Music File by Any Other Name, an article comparing the most common lossy formats, and discussing which ones are the most future proof. As I mentioned in yesterday&#8217;s posting, the only truly future proof way to store digital audio is to use a lossless codec like FLAC, Shorten or Apple Lossless Codec and convert to compressed lossy formats as needed. Hard drive space is getting cheaper and cheaper&#8230;I&#8217;ve gotten no fewer than 3 emails this week alone from places like buy.com offering external 320 gig hard drives for about $170&#8230;.so at about 50 cents per gig and considering you can store about 3 albums per gig in FLAC format it seems pretty economical if you want the maximum quality possible. Wired plans to cover lossless formats in a future article. Wired has gotten a lot of feedback on their music articles published this week and opinions vary widely&#8230;take a look here to see what readers have to say. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computerworld Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.jazzodyssey.com/mp3-sound-quality-organizing-a-digital-music-library/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Computerworld Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gatesofdelerium.com/wordpress/?p=192#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stressed by compressed media files&lt;/strong&gt;

If you&#039;re like most digital music users, you&#039;ve probably done a double take when listening to certain songs in your collection that sound a bit strange. Maybe it&#039;s a general tinnyness, or a cymbal that seems too sharp, or complex arrangements that a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stressed by compressed media files</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like most digital music users, you&#8217;ve probably done a double take when listening to certain songs in your collection that sound a bit strange. Maybe it&#8217;s a general tinnyness, or a cymbal that seems too sharp, or complex arrangements that a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
